First matter free.
One audit or one motion, on a case you choose, back in about a week. Yours either way.
Harvey, the legal AI half the Am Law 100 now runs, costs those firms millions a year. I build that edge for yours instead: a tailored AI paralegal that takes the gathering, the drafting, and the checking off your desk. You keep the judgment.
I’m Jaden Van, a USC computer science graduate and paralegal. I built and run the system inside a Los Angeles criminal-defense practice, where it is in daily use and supported a federal trial.
Every page, every recording, every exhibit, read and cross-checked. What comes back is ranked by what it costs you.
Their best response to your filing, written out before you send it, from the public record and your history with that judge.
Name the work that costs you the most and a pipeline gets built for it, drafting to your courts and in your voice.
Six automated reviewers read the draft against the record. Your attorney signs every deliverable.
Nothing to install, nothing for your staff to learn. Send one file to start. After that I work inside the systems your files already live in, so the ask becomes a sentence: name the matter and what you want back.
Already run Protégé or CoCounsel? Keep them. Those are one assistant, sold to every firm the same. This is a system built around yours.
Pick yours.
One audit or one motion, on a case you choose, back in about a week. Yours either way.
Three flat sizes, no seats, no hourly billing, month to month.
First two firms. Rate locked a year, cancel any month.
Your files never train any model; draft text is never uploaded for cite checks.
Confidentiality under a signed Data-Handling Commitment; files returned or deleted on request.
Wired by connector into the tools you already use, never copied into another product.
Me. I build the pipeline around your firm, run each matter through it, and read the output before it reaches you. If something is not right, I fix it until it is, at no extra cost. You sign because it is your case. My job is to make that the only thing left to do.
A signed confidentiality agreement comes first. Your files never train any model: the tools run under terms that forbid it, and the software your files pass through is listed for you before anything moves. Files are returned or deleted on request, and your firm’s work is never used as a sample.
It gets caught before it reaches you, or I correct it the same day. Six automated reviewers read the finished draft against the source, including the operative pleading the drafters never reopened, and a draft claiming more than the record supports is blocked, not delivered. It blocked the real filed motion on this site on its first pass. Every defect ever found becomes a locked test that reruns on every job after it, nineteen so far, none removed to make a run pass.
No. There is nothing to install and no logins. I work inside the systems your files already live in, so your staff keep working exactly as they do and finished work comes back to them. It is a service, not a tool.
Criminal defense is where it was built and where it runs daily. The same parts assemble into a rail for your practice, tailored on day one from your own filed samples. Pick your practice and see the rail →
Nothing. One discovery audit or one motion, on a matter you choose, back in about a week, and yours to keep either way. Whether anything follows is your call afterward.
Client files are never shown, so the first was built to mirror one: same document types, same failure modes, same checks that run on real matters. The second is a real motion, redacted, with public authorities you can look up.
regression 19/19 · 11 citations verified live · re-run them yourself ↻