See it work / problem, and what it does

The week you have, and what this does about it.

Everything below runs today inside a working California criminal-defense practice, on real deadlines including a federal trial. What it does, job by job → Case names below are invented so no one is exposed.

01
The problem

A three-hundred-page discovery production lands on a Friday, with a prelim in twelve days, and you still have to read all of it yourself.

Pipeline 01 · discovery
Discovery audit
5 agentsProduction readeragentdiscoveryProduction readerReads every page and body-cam file, text-extracted, OCR'd, or transcribed with timestamps.outputs a fact ledger, each fact tagged to its source→Cross-referenceragentanalysisCross-referencerChecks each source against the others and flags where they contradict.outputs contradictions surfaced, both sources cited→Impact rankeragentanalysisImpact rankerOrders findings by how much they move the case, not by page order.outputs findings ordered, strongest first→Motion drafteragentmotionsMotion drafterTurns the strongest finding into the motion it sets up, in your voice.outputs a filing-ready draft→Demand drafteragentdiscoveryDemand drafterDrafts the letter for what the DA did not produce.outputs a demand letter, ready to send
What it does

The discovery audit reads every page and body-camera file, cross-references them, and returns findings ranked by impact, constitutional issues flagged, gaps named, a draft of the motion it sets up, and a draft demand letter to the DA. A day of work comes back for review.

exhibitDA-000116 · p.5 ¶4
Arrest report · p.5 ¶4DA-000116
Based on the alert and my training and experience, I then conducted a search of the passenger compartment and located a compartment containing suspected narcotics.
BWC_VANCE_0314.mp4
BWC + dispatch timeline02:11:07 → 02:14:22
02:11:07console search begins · BWC 09:20
02:12:44"sort out the PC later" · BWC 10:57
02:14:22K-9 unit arrives · CAD #011
3 minbefore the dog arrived. The PC came after.
Built case (People v. M. Ellison). Real pipeline, real output.
02
The problem

A suppression motion is a week you do not have: pull the record, find the controlling cases, format it correctly, and check every cite.

Pipeline 02 · motions
Motion pipeline
5 agentsStrategy gateagentstrategyStrategy gateNothing drafts a word until you approve the theory of the motion.outputs your approved theory, on the record→Format drafteragentmotionsFormat drafterWrites to your court's exact pleading format and your templates.outputs a draft in your court's format→Exhibit pinneragentverificationExhibit pinnerTies each factual claim to a specific exhibit and page.outputs every claim tied to an exhibit→Citation verifieragentverificationCitation verifierPulls and checks every citation against the public record.outputs each authority confirmed or flagged→Pre-delivery gateagentverificationPre-delivery gateHands off to the automated six-reviewer gate before anything reaches you.outputs a checked draft, defects caught
What it does

Your theory first: nothing drafts until you greenlight the strategy. Then it drafts to your court's format, ties each claim to an exhibit, and verifies every citation live in California Style Manual, routed through the same automated six-reviewer gate. You edit and sign.

motion pipeline · from audit to filing-ready
The same audit that timed the search became a filing-ready motion to suppress, the K-9 timeline as its spine, every fact pinned to a page.
On People v. M. Ellison, Penal Code 1538.5, built on the search-before-alert record above, each recital reconciled to the charging document.
Built case (People v. M. Ellison). Real pipeline, real output.
03
The problem

The risk is not that the work is slow. It is that something finished and wrong goes out under your name.

Pipeline 03 · verification
Pre-delivery gate
6 automatedBlind reviewersagentverificationBlind reviewersSix automated reviewers, each reading with no memory of how the draft was written.outputs six independent reads→Factual-recital checkeragentverificationFactual-recital checkerReads the charging document the drafters never opened; every charge, count, enhancement, and date checked back to source.outputs every recital matched to source→Gate decisionagentverificationGate decisionA blank section or stray placeholder stops delivery. It does not pass.outputs pass, or blocked with the defect named
What it does

An automated six-reviewer gate checks every draft against the record. Five of the six can still pass a document that is uniformly wrong: they only read the draft itself. The sixth reads the charging document the drafters never opened, and reconciles every charge, count, enhancement, and date to source. You are the last line.

pre-delivery gate · a real catch
A felony filing, marked finished and ready, carried four defects no internal check would surface, because an internal check only compares the draft to itself.
On a matter we call Meridian, the gate read the source the drafter never did:
blank declaration enhancement mis-scoped to all counts wrong incident date displaced service email
A real catch. The matter is disguised as "Meridian" and no client details are shown; the four defects are the real ones.
04
The problem

Then there is the case bigger than your practice: a federal trial, an expert to cross, and no staff to prepare it.

Trial support · bespoke
Trial tier
bespokeRed-teamagenttrialRed-teamAttacks your own opening from the prosecution's side.outputs the holes in your opening, before the jury sees them→Cross builderagenttrialCross builderAssembles cross-examination binders by script.outputs a cross binder per witness→Promises ledgeragenttrialPromises ledgerTracks every promise to the jury against the evidence for it.outputs every promise matched to its proof→Testify memoagenttrialTestify memoAssembles the cross the decision turns on, for the attorney to work through with the client.outputs a recommendation, a condition, a fallback
What it does

The trial tier is bespoke; it supported a federal trial. It red-teams your opening from the prosecution's side, builds cross binders by script, and keeps a promises-to-evidence ledger so nothing promised to the jury goes unproven.

trial tier · prosecution red-team
It red-teamed our own opening from the other side and caught a self-defeating causation argument before it ever reached the jury.
Alongside a testify decision memo: a recommendation, a condition, and a fallback for whether he takes the stand.
Built case (United States v. D. Okafor). The pattern mirrors real trial work and was reviewed and cleared before publication.
the rest of the bench / purpose-built, not generic

Four problems shown. The bench is deeper.

Each of these is its own agent or pipeline. Or read one whole matter, stage by stage →

agentintelligence

Adversary modeling

How this judge and DDA have ruled before.

outputs a ruling-likelihood read, counters included
agentintelligence

DDA, judge & officer profiles

Tendencies and credibility record of the people across the courtroom.

outputs a dossier per person, recusal checked
agentverification

Citation verifier

Every cite checked against the public record before filing.

outputs each authority confirmed or flagged
pipelinediscovery

Discovery responses

Responses to interrogatories, admissions, and demands, drafted request by request.

outputs objection-checked responses
pipelinehearings

Hearing prep

A one-page snapshot of every matter on tomorrow's calendar.

outputs the matter reconciled to the docket
agentdiscovery

Redacted client copies

Protected discovery cleaned for the client, the working file untouched.

outputs a clean client copy

None of these is generic, bent to fit your firm. Each exists because a real defense workflow needed it.

This is the product: not an app you log into, but a person who works as your firm's AI solutions analyst. The first one is free. Not criminal? See your practice's pipeline sketched from the same foundation →